Resources / CAMO

CAMO, AMO and Part-145 — explained without the jargon.

Practitioner reference sheets from the AeroOps360 team — the distinctions that decide who is accountable when a regulator or customer asks.

Reference Sheet 01

CAMO vs AMO — who does what

AeroOps360AeroOps360

CAMO

The documented side

Defines the “what”

  • Owns engineering orders and work-package definition
  • Plans maintenance and controls compliance status
  • Accountable for continuing airworthiness of the fleet
  • Approves the maintenance programme and reliability data

AMO

The hands-on side

Performs the “how”

  • Carries out maintenance, inspection and troubleshooting
  • Executes the tasks exactly as released to the floor
  • Certifies completed work and releases to service
  • Owns tooling, facility and technician competency

In short: the CAMO decides what must be done and when; the AMO decides how it is done and certifies that it was. Both are required — and the interface between them is where most findings appear.

Reference Sheet 02

CAMO vs Part-145 organisation

AeroOps360AeroOps360

CAMO

Manages continuing airworthiness across the aircraft lifecycle

Part-145

Delivers physical maintenance and approved modifications

CAMO

Ensures the work is specified and completed to the required standard

Part-145

Completes the maintenance tasks as scoped and documented

CAMO

Analysis, planning, reliability and programme management

Part-145

Practical, hands-on maintenance execution

CAMO

Staffed by airworthiness engineers, planners and managers

Part-145

Staffed by certifying technicians and mechanics

CAMO

Active continuously, for the whole life of the aircraft

Part-145

Active whenever maintenance or modification work is performed

Reference Sheet 03

Accountability in contracted aviation services

AeroOps360AeroOps360

The fundamental principle: you cannot outsource accountability.

Tasks can be delegated. Ultimate responsibility for safety stays with the organisation holding the certificate.

Ground Handling

ORGH.MGM.205

Arrangement

Contracting non-certified providers (IT, cleaning, facilities)

Nature of the relationship

The provider operates entirely outside aviation certification rules.

Primary safety accountability

The ground handling organisation

Must apply its own SMS to identify and mitigate the risk before the contract starts.

Arrangement

Contracting certified providers (other approved organisations)

Nature of the relationship

The provider holds its own relevant aviation approval.

Primary safety accountability

Shared responsibility

The provider owns its tasks; you still assess the impact on your own operation.

Maintenance

Part-145.A.205

Arrangement

Subcontracting — the third party works under your umbrella

Nature of the relationship

Work is performed under your approval and management system.

Primary safety accountability

Your Part-145 organisation

You retain full responsibility; the work is released under your certificate.

Arrangement

Contracting — engaging another approved Part-145

Nature of the relationship

Work is released under the other organisation's own approval.

Primary safety accountability

Transfer of specific responsibility

Responsibility for those tasks moves to the organisation releasing the work.

CAMO

CAMO.A.205

Arrangement

Contracting maintenance to an approved Part-145

Nature of the relationship

The CAMO engages a Part-145 to perform the physical maintenance.

Primary safety accountability

Dual accountability

Part-145 owns the task; the CAMO retains ultimate accountability for continuing airworthiness.

Arrangement

Subcontracting CAM tasks (AD analysis, planning)

Nature of the relationship

Limited tasks performed by qualified organisations under the CAMO's system.

Primary safety accountability

The CAMO

Full accountability stays with the CAMO; tasks must be listed on the certificate.

Universal requirements — applies to every sector

SMS integration

Every contracted activity belongs in your hazard identification and risk management process.

Active compliance monitoring

Never contract and forget. Audit and verify provider approvals on a defined cycle.

Authority access

The competent authority must have guaranteed access to your third-party providers.

Occurrence reporting

Clear channels must exist so safety data flows in both directions between organisations.

Not sure where your accountability actually sits?

We map your contracted and subcontracted activities against your approvals, then close the gaps before an auditor finds them.

Talk to a Compliance Specialist

Ready to Elevate Your Aviation Operations?

Talk to the AeroOps360 team about compliance, operations and technology — and where to start.